LEGAL RESOURCE AND INSIGHTS FROM DOZIER MILLER
Search by Practice Areas
- All
- Appeals
- Business Law
- Church Law
- Criminal Defense
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Immigration
- Litigation
- Mediation & Arbitration
- News and Events
- Personal Injury
- Uncategorized
Navigating Non-Compete Agreements in Light of the FTC’s New Ruling
In the evolving landscape of employment law, non-compete agreements have long been a tool for businesses to…
Dating and Sex after Separation: What’s Allowed?
Dating and intimate relationships create some questions for people who are separated but not yet legally divorced….
Do I need a last will and testament?
Clients often call Dozier Miller Law asking whether they need a Last Will and Testament (commonly called a “will”)….
Child Custody Basics: Custody, Mediation, and Fees
In Divorce, Explained, there were 5 typical claims discussed: (1) child custody; (2) child support; (3) spousal support…
Do Church Employees Need Employment Contracts?
It is not uncommon for churches and ministers to question whether an employment contract is needed for…
What is Arbitration?
Arbitration is a dispute-resolution process in which the disputing parties choose one or more neutral third parties…
How Does COVID-19 Affect My Contract?
There is no doubt that COVID-19 has affected almost every industry in North Carolina and across the…
Administrative Order Regarding the COVID-19 Modified Court Operations for June 2020
An ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER has been entered to ensure the fair and proper administration of justice and to…
Not Business as Usual at the Courthouse; Family Court Cases During COVID-19
As courts resume in North Carolina, it is not business as usual at the courthouse. Courts are…
Dozier Miller in the News
Noncompete agreements in NC
Dozier Miller’s Adam Hocutt talks to The Charlotte Observer and Raleigh’s The News & Observer about noncompete agreements in North Carolina: Who uses them, what the law says and if the FTC will ban them.
Products liability
Plane crash; vibration damper defect alleged; engine failure; real estate company founder, wife killed; eight children. $26.05 million settlement
Accounting malpractice
Claims that fraudulent audits allowed a Burlington company to hide huge losses in a reinsurance pool led to a $250 million settlement that topped Lawyers Weekly’s survey of the 25 largest verdicts and settlements in 2005.
Representing an injured marine
Dozier Miller’s Adam Hocutt talks to WSOC-TV news anchor Allison Latos about about representing Marine Caleb Murry, who is seeking surgery after a boat injury.
Failure to diagnose
The plaintiff, Terrence Forrest, is a 46-year-old business consultant. His malpractice suit claimed the defendants failed to inform him that the biopsy of his mole suggested there was regression of a melanocytic lesion. Approximately a year and a half after the biopsy, the plaintiff was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
Buyer claws back deposit from builder
Dozier Miller’s Adam Hocutt shares how his clients fought to get back a $46,000 deposit for an unbuilt house, claiming the builder tried to charge them for items that were already included in the contract.
Vague biopsy slides
A Charlotte businessman who claimed a dermatologist should have told him that his negative biopsy results didn’t rule out melanoma has recovered $1.5 million.
Good Samaritan scam
Dozier Miller’s Adam Hocutt talked to WSOC-TV news anchor Allison Latos about the work he is doing to defend international college students scammed out of thousands of tuition dollars by The Neighborhood Good Samaritan Center.
Wrongful death
Deceased entered intersection on green light. Tractor-trailer ran red light. $2.12 million settlement.
Wedding morning pre-nup
A Mecklenburg County woman will be able to seek an equitable distribution of her marital assets after a jury set aside a pre-nuptial agreement she signed on the morning of her wedding, finding that the agreement was not entered into voluntarily, the woman’s attorneys report.
REMEMBER: Always speak with your own attorney
This information is provided for informational purposes only; it is not offered as and does not constitute legal advice.